The origins of structuralism connect with the work of Ferdinand de Saussure on linguistics , along with the linguistics of the Prague and Moscow schools. Because different languages have different words to refer to the same objects or concepts, there is no intrinsic reason why a specific signifier is used to express a given concept or idea. It is thus "arbitrary". Signs thus gain their meaning from their relationships and contrasts with other signs.

Author:Samugore Zukasa
Language:English (Spanish)
Published (Last):6 May 2013
PDF File Size:18.29 Mb
ePub File Size:4.19 Mb
Price:Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

The origins of structuralism connect with the work of Ferdinand de Saussure on linguistics , along with the linguistics of the Prague and Moscow schools. Because different languages have different words to refer to the same objects or concepts, there is no intrinsic reason why a specific signifier is used to express a given concept or idea.

It is thus "arbitrary". Signs thus gain their meaning from their relationships and contrasts with other signs. Blending Freud and Saussure, the French post structuralist Jacques Lacan applied structuralism to psychoanalysis and, in a different way, Jean Piaget applied structuralism to the study of psychology. But Jean Piaget, who would better define himself as constructivist , considers structuralism as "a method and not a doctrine" because for him "there exists no structure without a construction, abstract or genetic".

With a very few exceptions First, that a structure determines the position of each element of a whole. Second, that every system has a structure. Third, structural laws deal with co-existence rather than change. Fourth, structures are the "real things" that lie beneath the surface or the appearance of meaning. This approach examines how the elements of language relate to each other in the present, synchronically rather than diachronically.

A structural "idealism" is a class of linguistic units lexemes , morphemes or even constructions that are possible in a certain position in a given linguistic environment such as a given sentence , which is called the "syntagm". The different functional role of each of these members of the paradigm is called "value" valeur in French.

One can find dozens of books of literary theory bogged down in signifiers and signifieds, but only a handful that refer to Chomsky. Rather than simply compiling a list of which sounds occur in a language, the Prague school sought to examine how they were related. They determined that the inventory of sounds in a language could be analysed in terms of a series of contrasts.

Phonology would become the paradigmatic basis for structuralism in a number of different fields. Main article: Structural anthropology According to structural theory in anthropology and social anthropology, meaning is produced and reproduced within a culture through various practices, phenomena and activities that serve as systems of signification.

A structuralist approach may study activities as diverse as food-preparation and serving rituals, religious rites, games, literary and non-literary texts, and other forms of entertainment to discover the deep structures by which meaning is produced and reproduced within the culture.

A third influence came from Marcel Mauss — , who had written on gift-exchange systems. In the United States, authors such as Marshall Sahlins and James Boon built on structuralism to provide their own analysis of human society. Structural anthropology fell out of favour in the early s for a number of reasons.

Authors such as Eric Wolf argued that political economy and colonialism should be at the forefront of anthropology. The Biogenetic Structuralism group for instance argued that some kind of structural foundation for culture must exist because all humans inherit the same system of brain structures.

They proposed a kind of neuroanthropology which would lay the foundations for a more complete scientific account of cultural similarity and variation by requiring an integration of cultural anthropology and neuroscience —a program that theorists such as Victor Turner also embraced. In literary theory and criticism[ edit ] Main article: Semiotic literary criticism In literary theory , structuralist criticism relates literary texts to a larger structure, which may be a particular genre , a range of intertextual connections, a model of a universal narrative structure , or a system of recurrent patterns or motifs.

Hence, everything that is written seems to be governed by specific rules, or a "grammar of literature", that one learns in educational institutions and that are to be unmasked. Structuralist readings focus on how the structures of the single text resolve inherent narrative tensions. If a structuralist reading focuses on multiple texts, there must be some way in which those texts unify themselves into a coherent system.

Structuralistic literary criticism argues that the "literary banter of a text" can lie only in new structure, rather than in the specifics of character development and voice in which that structure is expressed. Some critics have also tried to apply the theory to individual works, but the effort to find unique structures in individual literary works runs counter to the structuralist program and has an affinity with New Criticism. History and background[ edit ] Throughout the s and s, existentialism , such as that propounded by Jean-Paul Sartre , was the dominant European intellectual movement.

Structuralism rose to prominence in France in the wake of existentialism, particularly in the s. The initial popularity of structuralism in France led to its spread across the globe.

Structuralism rejected the concept of human freedom and choice and focused instead on the way that human experience and thus, behaviour, is determined by various structures. In Elementary Structures he examined kinship systems from a structural point of view and demonstrated how apparently different social organizations were in fact different permutations of a few basic kinship structures. In the late s he published Structural Anthropology , a collection of essays outlining his program for structuralism.

By the early s structuralism as a movement was coming into its own and some believed that it offered a single unified approach to human life that would embrace all disciplines. Roland Barthes and Jacques Derrida focused on how structuralism could be applied to literature. Structuralism has often been criticized for being ahistorical and for favouring deterministic structural forces over the ability of people to act. By the end of the century structuralism was seen as an historically important school of thought, but the movements that it spawned, rather than structuralism itself, commanded attention.

Conversion was not just a matter of accepting a new paradigm. It was, almost, a question of salvation. Sociologist Anthony Giddens is another notable critic; while Giddens draws on a range of structuralist themes in his theorizing, he dismisses the structuralist view that the reproduction of social systems is merely "a mechanical outcome".


John Sturrock

Amazon Renewed Refurbished products with a warranty. Return to Book Page. John rated it really liked it Jan 27, John Knight rated it it was amazing May 19, S Sanyal rated it really liked it Aug 23, A classic strurock in literary and cultural theory. Learn more about Amazon Prime.



Steven Chang marked it as to-read Structturalism 03, Ema Jones marked it as to-read Nov 23, Charles Hebenstreit marked it as to-read Dec 12, James marked it as to-read Oct 29, Structuralism Addresses, essays, lectures. Read more Read less. Undertowe added it Nov 10, Lists with This Book. The Reception of Structuralism and Post-Structuralism. We use cookies strucfuralism give you the best possible experience. Jeremy rated it really liked it Mar 03, Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.



Oxford, pp. Structuralism and Since demands, though, that its title be taken literally. It is significant that it should bear the date , though, for it is very much a book which closes and summarises the ideas of two decades, not a book which opens a new decade of inquiry. Indeed, the sheer expertise of these five essays, the sense of there being nothing significant to add after a page summary, makes one realise how much time has passed since Foucault published, in , what was then an almost incomprehensible book, Les Mots et les Choses, and since Lacan published, in the same year, what was agreed on all sides to be an absolutely incomprehensible book, Ecrits. It has become a matter of knowledge almost, rather than opinion. Brilliantly expounded, with cracking pace and unflappable self-confidence, the book is a mine of information and an indispensable primer to anyone who comes to the subject fresh and ready to make a new conquest, just as it is an extraordinarily adept configuration of the field for those who may come to the subject weary from old failures to understand, or convinced that it is either marginal or obscure.



Dabei Amazon Music Stream millions of songs. Reissued to coincide with calls for a return to structuralism. Sign in to use this feature. Customers who viewed this item also viewed. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies.

Related Articles